Bruce Strauss v. Bruce Cole
Opinion
In this adversary proceeding filed in the Chapter 7 involuntary bankruptcy case of debtor Mamtek US, Inc., Bruce Cole and Nanette Cole appeal after the bankruptcy court 1 granted the trustee’s motion for summary judgment on claims seeking to avoid certain fraudulent and preferential transfers, and the district court 2 adopted the bankruptcy court’s findings and conclusions, and independently granted the trustee’s motion. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, see Contemporary Indus. Corp. v. Frost, 564 F.3d 981, 984 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review), we conclude that there is no basis for reversal, see Exec. Benefits Ins. Agency v. Arkison, - U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2165, 2172-75, 189 L.Ed.2d 83 (2014). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
608 F. App'x 438 (Bruce Strauss v. Bruce Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.