Bruce Strauss v. Bruce Cole
This text of 608 F. App'x 438 (Bruce Strauss v. Bruce Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this adversary proceeding filed in the Chapter 7 involuntary bankruptcy case of debtor Mamtek US, Inc., Bruce Cole and Nanette Cole appeal after the bankruptcy court 1 granted the trustee’s motion for summary judgment on claims seeking to avoid certain fraudulent and preferential transfers, and the district court 2 adopted the bankruptcy court’s findings and conclusions, and independently granted the trustee’s motion. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, see Contemporary Indus. Corp. v. Frost, 564 F.3d 981, 984 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review), we conclude that there is no basis for reversal, see Exec. Benefits Ins. Agency v. Arkison, - U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2165, 2172-75, 189 L.Ed.2d 83 (2014). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
608 F. App'x 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-strauss-v-bruce-cole-ca8-2015.