Bruce Morrow v. Judicial Tenure Commission
This text of Bruce Morrow v. Judicial Tenure Commission (Bruce Morrow v. Judicial Tenure Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
October 30, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
162130 & (4) David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra BRUCE MORROW, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 162130 JUDICIAL TENURE COMMISSION, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 30, 2020 a1027 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bruce Morrow v. Judicial Tenure Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-morrow-v-judicial-tenure-commission-mich-2020.