Bruce Millar v. Construction Code Authority

Michigan Supreme Court

Bruce Millar v. Construction Code Authority

DecidedMay 19, 2017

Docket154437

StatusPublished

This text of Bruce Millar v. Construction Code Authority (Bruce Millar v. Construction Code Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bruce Millar v. Construction Code Authority, (Mich. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

May 19, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack 154437 David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen Kurtis T. Wilder, BRUCE MILLAR, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 154437 COA: 326544 Lapeer CC: 14-047734-CZ CONSTRUCTION CODE AUTHORITY, ELBA TOWNSHIP, and CITY OF IMLAY CITY, Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 4, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the plaintiff’s claim under the Whistleblowers Protection Act was barred by the 90-day limitation period set forth in MCL 15.363(1). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 19, 2017 s0516 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

May 19, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack 154437 David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen Kurtis T. Wilder, BRUCE MILLAR, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 154437 COA: 326544 Lapeer CC: 14-047734-CZ CONSTRUCTION CODE AUTHORITY, ELBA TOWNSHIP, and CITY OF IMLAY CITY, Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 4, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the plaintiff’s claim under the Whistleblowers Protection Act was barred by the 90-day limitation period set forth in MCL 15.363(1). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 19, 2017 s0516 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Bruce Millar v. Construction Code Authority, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-millar-v-construction-code-authority-mich-2017.