Bruce McCray v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 25, 2018·No. 18-3317·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D18-3317 _____________________________

BRUCE MCCRAY,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

September 25, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

ROBERTS, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Bruce McCray, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bruce McCray v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Bruce McCray v. State of Florida (Bruce McCray v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.