Bruce McConnell v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 23, 2012·No. 02-10-00459-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NOS. 02-10-00459-CV 02-10-00460-CV 02-10-00461-CV

BRUCE MCCONNELL APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 211TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On January 25, 2012, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed

as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P.

38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss these appeals for want of prosecution

unless appellant or any party desiring to continue these appeals filed with the

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeals.

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss these appeals for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: February 23, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bruce McConnell v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Bruce McConnell v. State (Bruce McConnell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.