Bruce McConnell v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NOS. 02-10-00459-CV 02-10-00460-CV 02-10-00461-CV
BRUCE MCCONNELL APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE
------------
FROM THE 211TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On January 25, 2012, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed
as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P.
38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss these appeals for want of prosecution
unless appellant or any party desiring to continue these appeals filed with the
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeals.
See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss these appeals for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: February 23, 2012
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bruce McConnell v. State (Bruce McConnell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.