Bruce Hopkins v. State
Opinion
Order entered March 9, 2021
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00324-CR No. 05-20-00325-CR
BRUCE HOPKINS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 32833CR & 32834CR
ORDER
Appellant, who was convicted of two offenses of aggravated sexual assault
of a child younger than fourteen years of age, filed a brief in which he identifies
the victim by name while quoting the record. This Court does not allow a party to
file a brief that discloses the names of victims or the names of witnesses who were
children at the time of the offenses, or the names of any other children discussed or
identified at trial. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b) (“Unless a court orders otherwise, an
electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.”), id. 9.10(a)(3) (“Sensitive Data Defined.
Sensitive data consists of . . . a birth date, a home address, and the name of any
person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.”). Accordingly,
we STRIKE appellant’s briefs.
We ORDER appellant to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order,
amended briefs that identify any individuals who were children at the time of this
or any other offense either generically (for example, “victim”) or by initials only,
including when quoting relevant portions of the record, giving a statement of the
case, or attaching an appendix.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable
Andrew Bench, Presiding Judge, 196th Judicial District Court; Toby Wilkinson;
and the Hunt County District Attorney’s Office.
.
/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK PRESIDING JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bruce Hopkins v. State (Bruce Hopkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.