Bruce Gilreath v. Theodore L. Beach D/B/A Beach Manufacturing Company
This text of 340 F.2d 306 (Bruce Gilreath v. Theodore L. Beach D/B/A Beach Manufacturing Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court holding invalid certain patents on rearview mirror assemblies and brackets, and dismissing the complaint charging defendant with unfair competition.
The district court ruled that the patents in suit were anticipated by the manufacture and sale of similar items by one William E. Jacobs more than a year prior to the date of filing of applications, and that these patents are void for lack of invention.
The case has been presented to this court upon briefs and oral arguments.
Upon consideration, we find no error in the judgment of the district court, which is affirmed upon the basis of the opinion of the district judge reported in 228 F.Supp. 359 (S.D. Ohio).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
340 F.2d 306, 144 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-gilreath-v-theodore-l-beach-dba-beach-manufacturing-company-ca6-1965.