Bruce G. Fagel, A Law Corp. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Harper)
This text of Bruce G. Fagel, A Law Corp. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Harper) (Bruce G. Fagel, A Law Corp. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Harper)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
BRUCE G. FAGEL, A LAW No. 83410 CORPORATION, A/K/A LAW OFFICES OF BRUCE G. FAGEL & ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FILED COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF OCT 1 5 2021 CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ELiZABETH . BROWN EME C•UR CLE JERRY A. WIESE, DISTRICT JUDGE, BY EPUTY CLERK Respondents, and DARIA HARPER, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND DANIEL WININGER, AN INDIVIDUAL, Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION This original petition for a writ of prohibition challenges a district court order denying, without an evidentiary hearing, a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Having considered the petition and its supporting documentation, we are not persuaded on this record that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted at this time. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ
71 - Z,1667,_ - relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.1
Jt , C.J. Hardesty
J. Sr.J. Stiglich
cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge Hall Jaffe & Clayton, LLP Maier Gutierrez & Associates Blumberg Law Corporation Eighth District Court Clerk
1The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignment.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
2 «). 1447A ••••$0,.
tr „„. 4 ,•,••• • "'` • " -0: 4-71.• • ..;.• 7."1 ", v-.1 • • •"•4":•..1 , . • •0.,rft • ••.t•t•••1' • -;, •
.tA. - -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bruce G. Fagel, A Law Corp. Vs. Dist. Ct. (Harper), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-g-fagel-a-law-corp-vs-dist-ct-harper-nev-2021.