Bruce Fulmer v. Scott Klein

Fifth Circuit

Bruce Fulmer v. Scott Klein

762 F.3d 450, 2014 WL 3882891, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15301

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedAugust 7, 2014

Docket12-10416

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 762 F.3d 450 (Bruce Fulmer v. Scott Klein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bruce Fulmer v. Scott Klein, 762 F.3d 450, 2014 WL 3882891, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15301 (5th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM:

Randy Kopp, an employee of Ideare, Inc., and a participant in the Ideare Management Plan (“the Plan”), brought this Employee Retirement Security Act (“ERISA”) action on behalf of all current and former participants in the Plan for whose individual accounts the Plan purchased or held shares of the Ideare Stock Fund from November 21, 2006 through March 31, 2009. The district court dismissed Kopp’s complaint under Rule 12(b)(6). Fulmer v. Klein, No. 3:09-CV-2354-N, 2012 WL 7634148 (N.D.Tex. Mar. 15, 2012). In an earlier opinion, we affirmed. Kopp v. Klein, 722 F.3d 327 (5th Cir.2013). The Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari, vacated our judgment, and remanded the case “for further consideration in light of Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, 573 U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2459, 189 L.Ed.2d 457 (2014).”

We VACATE the judgment of the Northern District of Texas, and REMAND for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion. 1

1

. Plaintiff-Appellant's motion to remand and Defendants-Appellees’ cross-motion for supplemental briefing are denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM:

Randy Kopp, an employee of Ideare, Inc., and a participant in the Ideare Management Plan (“the Plan”), brought this Employee Retirement Security Act (“ERISA”) action on behalf of all current and former participants in the Plan for whose individual accounts the Plan purchased or held shares of the Ideare Stock Fund from November 21, 2006 through March 31, 2009. The district court dismissed Kopp’s complaint under Rule 12(b)(6). Fulmer v. Klein, No. 3:09-CV-2354-N, 2012 WL 7634148 (N.D.Tex. Mar. 15, 2012). In an earlier opinion, we affirmed. Kopp v. Klein, 722 F.3d 327 (5th Cir.2013). The Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari, vacated our judgment, and remanded the case “for further consideration in light of Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, 573 U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2459, 189 L.Ed.2d 457 (2014).”

We VACATE the judgment of the Northern District of Texas, and REMAND for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion. 1

1

. Plaintiff-Appellant's motion to remand and Defendants-Appellees’ cross-motion for supplemental briefing are denied as moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

762 F.3d 450, 2014 WL 3882891, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-fulmer-v-scott-klein-ca5-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack