Bruce Edward Gorden v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 19, 2016·No. 01-16-00088-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-16-00088-CR Style: Bruce Edward Gorden v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed: April 13, 2016 Type of motion: Unopposed Motion to Substitute Counsel Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Sorcha Landau is permitted to withdraw from representing appellant, and the Clerk of this Court is directed to substitute Seth Kretzer for Sorcha Landau as appellant’s lead counsel. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.1, 6.5.

Judge's signature: /s/ Terry Jennings 

Date: April 19, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bruce Edward Gorden v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Bruce Edward Gorden v. State (Bruce Edward Gorden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.