Bruce Earl Godlock v. State
This text of Bruce Earl Godlock v. State (Bruce Earl Godlock v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-08-00179-CR ______________________________
BRUCE EARL GODLOCK, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 124th Judicial District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 36487-B
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley MEMORANDUM OPINION
Bruce Earl Godlock attempts to appeal from his conviction for delivery of a controlled
substance. His sentence was imposed June 5, 2008, and no motion for new trial was filed. His
notice of appeal was filed August 13, 2008.1
A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court's jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918
S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Rule 26.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure
prescribes the time period in which a notice of appeal must be filed by a defendant in order to perfect
appeal in a criminal case. A defendant's notice of appeal is timely if filed within thirty days after the
day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or within ninety days after sentencing if the
defendant timely files a motion for new trial. TEX . R. APP . P. 26.2(a); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522.
Because no motion for new trial was filed, the last date Godlock could timely file his notice of
appeal was July 7, 2008, thirty days after the day, according to his motion, the sentence was imposed
in open court. See TEX . R. APP . P. 26.2(a)(1); 4.1(b). Further, no motion for extension of time was
filed in this Court within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal.
1 Counsel filed an "Out of Time Notice of Appeal" on behalf of Godlock. In that notice of appeal, counsel states that Godlock requested and was appointed counsel for appeal on or about June 5, but appointed counsel was not notified by the trial court of the appointment until August 13.
2 Godlock has failed to perfect his appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of
jurisdiction.
Bailey C. Moseley Justice
Date Submitted: August 19, 2008 Date Decided: August 20, 2008
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bruce Earl Godlock v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-earl-godlock-v-state-texapp-2008.