Bruce Duncan Co. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 902, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1798
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJune 26, 1967
DocketNo. P67/214; protests 62/2939, etc. (Los Angeles)
StatusPublished

This text of 58 Cust. Ct. 902 (Bruce Duncan Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bruce Duncan Co. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 902, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1798 (cusc 1967).

Opinion

Eao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist [903]*903of horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc. v. United States (46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of Sherwin International, Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

G. Joannou Cycle Co. v. United States
46 Cust. Ct. 172 (U.S. Customs Court, 1961)
Sherwin International, Inc. v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 466 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Cust. Ct. 902, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-duncan-co-v-united-states-cusc-1967.