Bruce Duncan Co. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 419
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bruce Duncan Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 45 Cust. Ct. 85
United States Customs Court·Decided April 12, 1961·No. No. 65444; protests 59/10228, etc. (Los Angeles)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of fish netting similar in all material respects to that involved in Abstract 63947, the merchandise was held dutiable at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 923, as modified, for cotton fishing nets, by similitude. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of synthetic cord or twine similar [420]*420in all material respects to the component material of the fish nets involved in said Abstract 63947, were held dutiable, depending upon the date of entry, at 35 percent under paragraph 912 of the act as synthetic cord or twine, similar in use to cotton cords, or at 33, 31%, or 30 percent under said paragraph, as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bruce Duncan Co. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 419 (cusc 1961).

46 Cust. Ct. 419 (Bruce Duncan Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.