Bruce & Cook v. Crabtree

21 S.E. 194, 116 N.C. 528
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 5, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 21 S.E. 194 (Bruce & Cook v. Crabtree) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bruce & Cook v. Crabtree, 21 S.E. 194, 116 N.C. 528 (N.C. 1895).

Opinion

Furohes, J.:

This is a proceeding supplemental to execution, commenced before the Clerk of Lenoir County, an appeal from his order to Brown, Judge, and an appeal by J. L. Hartsfield from the order of Judge Brown, which is as follows:

“I am of opinion that under the affidavit filed it is perfectly competent for the plaintiff to examine J. L. Harts-field in the proceeding' to ascertain what sum, if any remains in his hands and what may be due aiid belonging to C. ~W. Crabtree, after discharging the trust, and to ascertain that it is competent to examine said Hartsfield concerning his administration of the trust, what he received, what h'e has paid out and to whom, etc.
“This cause is remanded to the Clerk to proceed with in accordance with this opinion. The cost of the apjfeal is taxed against the appellees and appellant equally. Brown, JJ

"We see no error in the order appealed from, nor do we see what right J. L. Hartsfield had to take an appeal, nor do we see what interest he has in this controversy.

But this is not a final judgment, but only an interlocutory order from which no appeal lies. Clement v. Foster, 39 N. C., 255.

Appeal Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ledford v. . Emerson
55 S.E. 969 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 S.E. 194, 116 N.C. 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-cook-v-crabtree-nc-1895.