Bruce C. Ward v. James Q. Halpern and Jane L. Halpern
This text of Bruce C. Ward v. James Q. Halpern and Jane L. Halpern (Bruce C. Ward v. James Q. Halpern and Jane L. Halpern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-08-00700-CV
Bruce C. Ward, Appellant
v.
James Q. Halpern and Jane L. Halpern, Appellees
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-08-003842, HONORABLE JOHN K. DIETZ, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The parties have filed an agreed motion to dismiss, explaining that they have settled
their dispute. The parties ask that we dismiss the appeal, taxing costs against the party who incurred
them, and that we issue mandate early. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. Tex. R.
App. P. 42.1(a)(2). Mandate will issue concurrent with this opinion.
___________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson
Dismissed on Agreed Motion
Filed: January 21, 2009
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bruce C. Ward v. James Q. Halpern and Jane L. Halpern, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-c-ward-v-james-q-halpern-and-jane-l-halpern-texapp-2009.