Bruce Bell, Jr. v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner, Social Security Administration

129 F.3d 121, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 37466, 1997 WL 636615
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 14, 1997
Docket97-1384
StatusUnpublished

This text of 129 F.3d 121 (Bruce Bell, Jr. v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner, Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bruce Bell, Jr. v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 129 F.3d 121, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 37466, 1997 WL 636615 (8th Cir. 1997).

Opinion

129 F.3d 121

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Bruce BELL, Jr., Appellant,
v.
Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner, Social Security
Administration, Appellee.

No. 97-1384.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 3, 1997.
Filed Oct. 14, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Bruce Bell, Jr., appeals the district court's1 order granting summary judgment affirming the Commissioner's decision to deny Bell disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. After reviewing the record and the parties' submissions, we conclude the Commissioner's decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. See Piepgras v. Chater, 76 F.3d 233, 236 (8th Cir.1996) (standard of review). We further conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Bell's motion to supplement the record and remand. See Geigle v. Sullivan, 961 F.2d 1395, 1397 (8th Cir.1992) (standard of review); Woolf v. Shalala, 3 F.3d 1210, 1215 (8th Cir.1993) (circumstances permitting 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) remand).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 F.3d 121, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 37466, 1997 WL 636615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-bell-jr-v-shirley-s-chater-commissioner-soci-ca8-1997.