Bruce Allen Settenberg v. State of North Carolina
This text of 56 F.3d 62 (Bruce Allen Settenberg v. State of North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
56 F.3d 62
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Bruce Allen SETTENBERG, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE of North Carolina, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 95-6248.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 26, 1995.
Bruce Allen Settenberg, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Settenberg v. North Carolina, No. CA-94-1013-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F.3d 62, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19127, 1995 WL 318739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruce-allen-settenberg-v-state-of-north-carolina-ca4-1995.