Brubaker v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brubaker v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

248 S.W.3d 624, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 218, 2008 WL 375591

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 13, 2008

DocketED 88375

StatusPublished

This text of 248 S.W.3d 624 (Brubaker v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brubaker v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, 248 S.W.3d 624, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 218, 2008 WL 375591 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

*625 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Brubaker (Brubaker) appeals from the trial court’s final judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding against Union Pacific Railroad Company (Union Pacific) and awarding Brubaker damages on Count I of his Second Amended Petition, filed pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), Title 45 U.S.C., Section 51 et seq., which alleged that Brubaker was injured during the course and scope of his employment as a locomotive engineer for Union Pacific. Brubaker also appeals the trial court’s grant of Union Pacific’s pre-trial Motion to Dismiss Count II of Brubaker’s Second Amended Petition on the ground that Count II did not state a cause of action separate from the cause of action contained in Count I.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*625 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Brubaker (Brubaker) appeals from the trial court’s final judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding against Union Pacific Railroad Company (Union Pacific) and awarding Brubaker damages on Count I of his Second Amended Petition, filed pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), Title 45 U.S.C., Section 51 et seq., which alleged that Brubaker was injured during the course and scope of his employment as a locomotive engineer for Union Pacific. Brubaker also appeals the trial court’s grant of Union Pacific’s pre-trial Motion to Dismiss Count II of Brubaker’s Second Amended Petition on the ground that Count II did not state a cause of action separate from the cause of action contained in Count I.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 S.W.3d 624, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 218, 2008 WL 375591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brubaker-v-union-pacific-railroad-company-moctapp-2008.