Brubaker Estate

30 A.2d 135, 346 Pa. 339, 1943 Pa. LEXIS 331
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 18, 1943
DocketAppeal, 18
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 30 A.2d 135 (Brubaker Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brubaker Estate, 30 A.2d 135, 346 Pa. 339, 1943 Pa. LEXIS 331 (Pa. 1943).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from an order of the Orphans’ Court of Lycoming County dismissing exceptions of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to an auditor’s report disallowing a claim of $3,170.20, presented by the Commonwealth against the Estate of Herbert M. Brubaker, deceased, for expenses incurred by it in the maintenance of decedent’s insane and indigent son at the Danville State Hospital for the Insane from January 5, 1931, to January 7, 1941, the date of decedent’s death. This son was committed to the Hospital upon an order made on January 5, 1931, by the Court of Quarter Sessions of Lycoming County, which placed the costs of maintenance on the county. The order was never revised or challenged and for that reason, the Orphans’ Court upheld the auditor in disallowing the claim.

The Act of June 1, 1915, P. L. 661, imposes liability for the support of an indigent, insane child, in the interest of the Commonwealth, on, inter alia, its parent. The fact that there has been no effort to enforce this liability during the lifetime of the parent does not bar the enforcement of such liability by appropriate proceedings against the parent’s estate; Harnish’s Estate, 268 *341 Pa. 128. The subsequent Act of July 11,1923, P. L. 998, known as The Mental Health Act, does not take away this right of the Commonwealth to present claims for expenses incurred in the maintenance of indigent, insane persons against their parents’ estate even though no effort to enforce such claims was made during the latters’ lifetime. Had the attention of the court below been called to our decision in Ilarnish’s Estate, supra, it would have undoubtedly so held in the instant case.

The order of the court below is reversed and the record is remitted with directions to make distribution in accordance with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Heiser
53 Pa. D. & C.2d 124 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1971)
Snyder Estate
34 Pa. D. & C.2d 637 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1965)
Chambers Estate
22 Pa. D. & C.2d 320 (Washington County Orphans' Court, 1960)
Low Estate
15 Pa. D. & C.2d 375 (Columbia County Orphans' Court, 1957)
Ercolini Estate
1 Pa. D. & C.2d 256 (Washington County Orphans' Court, 1954)
Gellnek Estate
75 Pa. D. & C. 219 (Delaware County Orphans' Court, 1951)
Commonwealth v. Rumford
71 Pa. D. & C. 359 (Bucks County Court of Common Pleas, 1950)
Stoner Estate
56 A.2d 250 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1947)
Chesney's Estate
47 Pa. D. & C. 261 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1943)
Krall's Estate
47 Pa. D. & C. 295 (Lebanon County Court of Common Pleas, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 A.2d 135, 346 Pa. 339, 1943 Pa. LEXIS 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brubaker-estate-pa-1943.