Broyles v. State

102 S.E. 381, 25 Ga. App. 17, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 558
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 3, 1920
Docket11060
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 102 S.E. 381 (Broyles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Broyles v. State, 102 S.E. 381, 25 Ga. App. 17, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 558 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinions

Bloodworth, J.

1. The charge of the court in this case was full and fair, and when the excerpts complained of are read in connection with the remainder of the charge and in. the light of all the facts of the case, they contain no error that would require the grant of a new trial.

2. As far as pertinent and legal, each request to charge was sufficiently covered by the charge given.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict; the judge approved it, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. State
184 S.E.2d 655 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 S.E. 381, 25 Ga. App. 17, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broyles-v-state-gactapp-1920.