Broyles v. State
102 S.E. 381, 25 Ga. App. 17, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 558
Opinions
1. The charge of the court in this case was full and fair, and when the excerpts complained of are read in connection with the remainder of the charge and in. the light of all the facts of the case, they contain no error that would require the grant of a new trial.
2. As far as pertinent and legal, each request to charge was sufficiently covered by the charge given.
3. The evidence authorized the verdict; the judge approved it, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Broyles v. State, 102 S.E. 381, 25 Ga. App. 17, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 558 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).
102 S.E. 381 (Broyles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. State
184 S.E.2d 655 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)