Broyles v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Broyles v. State

113 So. 623, 22 Ala. App. 135, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 96

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 7, 1927·No. 8 Div. 535, 536.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

RICE, J.

These appellants were indicted jointly with Lewis Watkins for the offense of “assault with intent to murder” one Oscar Neyman. While a severance was granted as to Lewis Watkips, and he was tried separately from the two appellants here, yet we are unable to distinguish the few questions presented to us for consideration on his appeal from those presented by this. Consequently, upon the authority of what we said in the opinion in Lewis Watkins v. State (8th Div. 542) ante, p. 134, 113 So. 622, the judgment here appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

These appellants were indicted jointly with Lewis Watkins for the offense of “assault with intent to murder” one Oscar Neyman. While a severance was granted as to Lewis Watkips, and he was tried separately from the two appellants here, yet we are unable to distinguish the few questions presented to us for consideration on his appeal from those presented by this. Consequently, upon the authority of what we said in the opinion in Lewis Watkins v. State (8th Div. 542) ante, p. 134, 113 So. 622, the judgment here appealed from is affirmed.

Broyles v. State, 113 So. 623, 22 Ala. App. 135, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 96 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

113 So. 623 (Broyles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related