Broyles v. Broyles

Missouri Court of Appeals

Broyles v. Broyles

515 S.W.3d 248, 2017 WL 1228776, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 264

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 4, 2017·No. No. ED103684·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mary L. Broyles appeals the judgment of the motion court granting Robert E. Broyles’s request to terminate child support and receive reimbursement, as well as the court’s decision against vacating that judgment. We find the motion court did not err, and we affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgments of the trial court are affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mary L. Broyles appeals the judgment of the motion court granting Robert E. Broyles’s request to terminate child support and receive reimbursement, as well as the court’s decision against vacating that judgment. We find the motion court did not err, and we affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgments of the trial court are affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Broyles v. Broyles, 515 S.W.3d 248, 2017 WL 1228776, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 264 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

515 S.W.3d 248 (Broyles v. Broyles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.