Broxton v. State

99 S.E. 635, 24 Ga. App. 31, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 393
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 14, 1919
Docket10616
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 99 S.E. 635 (Broxton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Broxton v. State, 99 S.E. 635, 24 Ga. App. 31, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 393 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. While it is mandatory upon the judge to whom a petition for a change of venue is presented in behalf of a defendant in a criminal case, under the act approved August 21, 1911 (Acts of 1911, p. 76), to change the venue if the evidence submitted should reasonably show that there is a “probability or danger of lynching or other violence,” it is primarily a question for the judge, upon the hearing of such petition, to determine from the evidence whether or not such probability or danger of lynching or other violence exists; and where the evidence upon such issue conflicts, the judgment denying the defendant’s motion to change the venue will not be reversed, unless manifestly erroneous. Where the evidence fails to reasonably show the probability or danger of lynching or other violence, it is not error on the part of the judge to refuse to change the venue. See Wilburn v. State, 140 Ga. 138 (78 S. E. 819) ; Shepherd v. State, 141 Ga. 527 (81 S. E. 441) ; Graham v. State, 141 Ga. 812, 818 (82 S. E. 282); Nice v. State, 22 Ga. App. 136 (95 S. E. 534).

2. Evidence that the defendant would receive a fair and impartial trial in the county wherein the alleged crime was committed was relevant, to throw light upon the state of the public mind and the consequent probability or danger of lynching or other violence.

3. The judge did not err in refusing to change the venue.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blevins v. State
134 S.E.2d 496 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Ledford v. State
129 S.E.2d 555 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Jones v. State
115 S.E.2d 576 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
McGruder v. State
102 S.E.2d 54 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
Crane v. State
93 S.E.2d 667 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Spires v. State
68 S.E.2d 622 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
English v. State
61 S.E.2d 52 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Barronton v. State
55 S.E.2d 252 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Morakis v. State
35 S.E.2d 155 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
Goss v. State
32 S.E.2d 187 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Bearden v. State
28 S.E.2d 669 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Cameron v. State
10 S.E.2d 216 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Griffin v. State
1 S.E.2d 41 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Goumas v. State
160 S.E. 682 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Grenoble v. State
154 S.E. 304 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Rawlings v. State
127 S.E. 881 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Coggeshall v. State
126 S.E. 568 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Wilson v. State
112 S.E. 295 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Crawley v. State
99 S.E. 705 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 S.E. 635, 24 Ga. App. 31, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broxton-v-state-gactapp-1919.