Broxton v. State

453 So. 2d 98, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13726
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 21, 1984·No. No. AV-378·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

THOMPSON, Judge.

Broxton appeals an order of probation, contending that the trial court erred in conditioning this order on his serving two consecutive 364-day periods of incarceration in the county jail. We reverse.

Broxton pled guilty to two counts of selling controlled substances. He was adjudged guilty of these two third degree felonies, and as to each count was placed on probation for a term of five years conditioned upon serving 364 days in the county jail. The periods of incarceration were to be served consecutively. The trial court’s order directing that the 364-day periods of incarceration be served consecutively rendered the order illegal under § 922.051, Fla.Stat. (1983) and Dade County v. Baker, 265 So.2d 700 (Fla.1972). Imprisonment for felonies may not cumulatively exceed one year if the county facilities are used.

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.

BARFIELD, J., concurs. NIMMONS, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broxton v. State, 453 So. 2d 98, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13726 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

453 So. 2d 98 (Broxton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kline v. State
509 So. 2d 1178 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Cigelski v. State
453 So. 2d 840 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)