Broxton v. State

453 So. 2d 98, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13726
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 21, 1984
DocketNo. AV-378
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 453 So. 2d 98 (Broxton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Broxton v. State, 453 So. 2d 98, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13726 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

THOMPSON, Judge.

Broxton appeals an order of probation, contending that the trial court erred in conditioning this order on his serving two consecutive 364-day periods of incarceration in the county jail. We reverse.

Broxton pled guilty to two counts of selling controlled substances. He was adjudged guilty of these two third degree felonies, and as to each count was placed on probation for a term of five years conditioned upon serving 364 days in the county jail. The periods of incarceration were to be served consecutively. The trial court’s order directing that the 364-day periods of incarceration be served consecutively rendered the order illegal under § 922.051, Fla.Stat. (1983) and Dade County v. Baker, 265 So.2d 700 (Fla.1972). Imprisonment for felonies may not cumulatively exceed one year if the county facilities are used.

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.

BARFIELD, J., concurs. NIMMONS, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kline v. State
509 So. 2d 1178 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Cigelski v. State
453 So. 2d 840 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 So. 2d 98, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broxton-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.