Broxie v. Household Finance Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Broxie v. Household Finance Co.

329 A.2d 835, 459 Pa. 494

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 30, 1974·No. No. 118·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The petition for allocatur is granted. The trial errors which caused the Superior Court to grant a new trial not having been properly preserved for appeal, see Commonwealth v. Reid, 458 Pa. 357, 326 A.2d 267 (1974); Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co., 457 Pa. 255, 322 A.2d 114 (1974); Commonwealth v. Agie, 449 Pa. 187, 296 A. 2d 741 (1972), its order granting a new trial is reversed 323 A.2d 364, and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for consideration of the remaining issues raised in the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The petition for allocatur is granted. The trial errors which caused the Superior Court to grant a new trial not having been properly preserved for appeal, see Commonwealth v. Reid, 458 Pa. 357, 326 A.2d 267 (1974); Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co., 457 Pa. 255, 322 A.2d 114 (1974); Commonwealth v. Agie, 449 Pa. 187, 296 A. 2d 741 (1972), its order granting a new trial is reversed 323 A.2d 364, and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for consideration of the remaining issues raised in the appeal.

Broxie v. Household Finance Co., 329 A.2d 835, 459 Pa. 494 (Pa. 1974).

Pincite

329 A.2d 835 (Broxie v. Household Finance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related