Browserweb Media Agency, Mark Burke v. Maxus Energy Corporation

Court of Appeals of Texas

Browserweb Media Agency, Mark Burke v. Maxus Energy Corporation

DecidedMarch 10, 2015

Docket01-14-01028-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Browserweb Media Agency, Mark Burke v. Maxus Energy Corporation (Browserweb Media Agency, Mark Burke v. Maxus Energy Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Browserweb Media Agency, Mark Burke v. Maxus Energy Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Browserweb Media Agency, Mark Burke v. Maxus Energy Corporation

Appellate case number: 01-14-01028-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-63727

Trial court: 11th District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s Informal Brief & Motion to Strike Court Reporter’s Record & Fees, filed on March 9, 2015, is DENIED. The documentation attached to the motion indicates appellant was billed for the district clerk’s record, which is separate and apart from the court reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5; 34.6. Appellant has not requested, nor been charged, for a court reporter’s record. Because appellant has informed us he will not be requesting a reporter’s record, we consider the record to be complete, and appellant’s brief is due within 30 days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellee’s brief will be due within 30 days of the date appellant’s brief is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b). It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown X Acting individually

Date: March 10, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Browserweb Media Agency, Mark Burke v. Maxus Energy Corporation

Appellate case number: 01-14-01028-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-63727

Trial court: 11th District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s Informal Brief & Motion to Strike Court Reporter’s Record & Fees, filed on March 9, 2015, is DENIED. The documentation attached to the motion indicates appellant was billed for the district clerk’s record, which is separate and apart from the court reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5; 34.6. Appellant has not requested, nor been charged, for a court reporter’s record. Because appellant has informed us he will not be requesting a reporter’s record, we consider the record to be complete, and appellant’s brief is due within 30 days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellee’s brief will be due within 30 days of the date appellant’s brief is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b). It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown X Acting individually

Date: March 10, 2015

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Browserweb Media Agency, Mark Burke v. Maxus Energy Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/browserweb-media-agency-mark-burke-v-maxus-energy--texapp-2015.