Brownville Power Corp. v. Hydro Development Group
97 A.D.2d 947, 468 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20755
Opinions
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated at Special Term, Stone, J. All concur, except Callahan, J., who dissents and votes to reverse, in an opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brownville Power Corp. v. Hydro Development Group, 97 A.D.2d 947, 468 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20755 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).
97 A.D.2d 947 (Brownville Power Corp. v. Hydro Development Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry Ford & Son, Inc. v. Little Falls Fibre Co.
280 U.S. 369 (Supreme Court, 1930)
Federal Power Commission v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
347 U.S. 239 (Supreme Court, 1954)
City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of Tacoma
357 U.S. 320 (Supreme Court, 1958)
Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power Commission
407 U.S. 926 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Capital Telephone Co. v. Pattersonville Telephone Co.
436 N.E.2d 461 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Schwartz v. Public Administrator
246 N.E.2d 725 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
de Rham v. Diamond
295 N.E.2d 763 (New York Court of Appeals, 1973)
Gilberg v. Barbieri
423 N.E.2d 807 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)