Brownsville Particle Board, Inc. v. Overhead Door Co.

417 P.2d 1019, 244 Or. 424, 1966 Ore. LEXIS 467
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided September 9, 1966·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the reasonable value of a used sander it alleged it had sold to defendant. Defendant answered with a denial and a [425] counterclaim for fraud. The case was tried to the court without a jury. The court found for plaintiff and entered judgment accordingly.

The real answer is that the evidence presented supports the finding of the trial court. It is not our function to review' the evidence. OES 17.435. In Honeywell, Admx. v. Turner et al, 1958, 214 Or 700, 705, 332 P2d 638, 640, we emphasized that “The finality of a finding by the trial court when sitting as a jury is too frequently lost sight of.” It was in this appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brownsville Particle Board, Inc. v. Overhead Door Co., 417 P.2d 1019, 244 Or. 424, 1966 Ore. LEXIS 467 (Or. 1966).

417 P.2d 1019 (Brownsville Particle Board, Inc. v. Overhead Door Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kirschbaum v. Abraham
517 P.2d 272 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1973)
Cox v. Ohio National Life Insurance Company
438 P.2d 998 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1968)