Brownsville Manuf'g Co. v. Lockwood

11 F. 705, 3 McCrary's Cir. Ct. Rpts 608, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2452
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri
DecidedApril 27, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 F. 705 (Brownsville Manuf'g Co. v. Lockwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brownsville Manuf'g Co. v. Lockwood, 11 F. 705, 3 McCrary's Cir. Ct. Rpts 608, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2452 (E.D. Mo. 1882).

Opinion

Treat, D. J.

There is only one proposition in this case, viz.: Whether the defendant’s composition deed is valid against this plaintiff. Without reviewing the evidence, or the legal propositions under[706]*706lying such inquiries, the court finds that the signatures of some of the creditors to the composition deed were obtained by giving to them more than their pro rata under the deed, with the view of securing their signatures, and that thereby the equality on which the validity of such deeds must rest was not observed. Hence said composition deed is invalid, and the plaintiff is entitled to recover what remains due to him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Chaplin
115 F. 162 (D. Massachusetts, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 F. 705, 3 McCrary's Cir. Ct. Rpts 608, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brownsville-manufg-co-v-lockwood-moed-1882.