Brownlee v. Whitesides

Indiana Supreme Court

Brownlee v. Whitesides

8 Blackf. 80, 1846 Ind. LEXIS 46

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJune 2, 1846

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 8 Blackf. 80 (Brownlee v. Whitesides) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brownlee v. Whitesides, 8 Blackf. 80, 1846 Ind. LEXIS 46 (Ind. 1846).

Pincite

Opinion

Dewey, J.

Whitesides filed a claim, in the Probate Court of Grant county, against the estate of Trash, of whose estate Brownlee was the administrator. The administrator disputed the claim, and the parties went to trial on an agreed case. Judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff appealed to the Circuit Court, which Court reversed the judgment of the Probate Court, and remanded the cause, with instruction to the Probate Court 'to enter a judgment for the plaintiff on the agreed case, which was accordingly done. From that judgment the defendant appeals to this Court.

The statute authorizes any person against whom there is a judgment, decree, order, &c., of the Probate Court, to take the cause either to the Supreme Court, or to the Circuit Court, for the correction of errors in the same manner, and subject to the same laws, rules, and regulations, by and under which judgments and decrees of the Circuit Courts may be taken to the Supreme Court. And the Court to [81]*81which a cause may be thus taken from the Probate Court, has the same jurisdiction thereof, and shall entertain, and determine the same, in all respects, as in cases of appeal and writs of error in the Supreme Court to correct the errors of the Circuit Courts. R. S. 1S43, p. 668.

J. Brownlee, for the appellant. W. March, for the appellee.

. . These provisions comer upon the Circuit Courts concurrent appellate jurisdiction with the Supreme Court over the judgments, decrees, orders, and proceedings of the Probate Courts; and have, as we conceive, the effect of rendering the decision of either Court conclusive as to all matters adjudicated by it. The judgment now attempted to be reversed was rendered by the Probate Court in conformity to the decision of the Circuit Court sitting as a Court of errors. It cannot be again revised either in that Court or this. We have no jurisdiction over the cause. It must therefore be dismissed. We will remark, however, that we see nothing amiss in the judgment of reversal by the Circuit Court.

Per Curiam.

The suit is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dewey, J.

Whitesides filed a claim, in the Probate Court of Grant county, against the estate of Trash, of whose estate Brownlee was the administrator. The administrator disputed the claim, and the parties went to trial on an agreed case. Judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff appealed to the Circuit Court, which Court reversed the judgment of the Probate Court, and remanded the cause, with instruction to the Probate Court 'to enter a judgment for the plaintiff on the agreed case, which was accordingly done. From that judgment the defendant appeals to this Court.

The statute authorizes any person against whom there is a judgment, decree, order, &c., of the Probate Court, to take the cause either to the Supreme Court, or to the Circuit Court, for the correction of errors in the same manner, and subject to the same laws, rules, and regulations, by and under which judgments and decrees of the Circuit Courts may be taken to the Supreme Court. And the Court to [81]*81which a cause may be thus taken from the Probate Court, has the same jurisdiction thereof, and shall entertain, and determine the same, in all respects, as in cases of appeal and writs of error in the Supreme Court to correct the errors of the Circuit Courts. R. S. 1S43, p. 668.

J. Brownlee, for the appellant. W. March, for the appellee.

. . These provisions comer upon the Circuit Courts concurrent appellate jurisdiction with the Supreme Court over the judgments, decrees, orders, and proceedings of the Probate Courts; and have, as we conceive, the effect of rendering the decision of either Court conclusive as to all matters adjudicated by it. The judgment now attempted to be reversed was rendered by the Probate Court in conformity to the decision of the Circuit Court sitting as a Court of errors. It cannot be again revised either in that Court or this. We have no jurisdiction over the cause. It must therefore be dismissed. We will remark, however, that we see nothing amiss in the judgment of reversal by the Circuit Court.

Per Curiam.

The suit is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Blackf. 80, 1846 Ind. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brownlee-v-whitesides-ind-1846.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack