Brownlee v. Allen

21 Mo. 123
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided March 15, 1855·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Ryland, Judge,

delivered tie opinion of the court.

The only matter to which our attention has been called, is in relation to the partnership of Hawley & Allen. From the facts agreed, the court below considered them as partners in the Cheltenham Springs, and declared the law to be in favor of the plaintiffs. In this declaration of the law, this court concurs with the court below. The facts agreed to clearly show that there was a partnership existing between these defendants in this Cheltenham Springs adventure, and such being the case, Allen is bound, as such partner, for the goods purchased by his co-partner of the plaintiffs. The judgment of the court below is therefore affirmed; the other judges concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brownlee v. Allen, 21 Mo. 123 (Mo. 1855).

21 Mo. 123 (Brownlee v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hynes v. Ecker
34 Mo. App. 650 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1889)