Browning v. Westropp

Ohio Circuit Courts

Browning v. Westropp

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 394

DecidedNovember 15, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 394 (Browning v. Westropp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Browning v. Westropp, 21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 394 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

WINCH, J.

In this case we hold that a residence district, so-called, created under the Jones law (act 98 O. L. 68), retains its boundaries for all purposes under the laws relating to the regulation of the liquor traffic until two years after a petition against the prohibition of the sale of liquor therein has been granted. A division of the territory of such residence district for municipal governmental purposes, has no effect upon said district as to the force and effect of the liquor laws therein.

So holding, leave to file a petition in error is refused.

Henry and Marvin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WINCH, J.

In this case we hold that a residence district, so-called, created under the Jones law (act 98 O. L. 68), retains its boundaries for all purposes under the laws relating to the regulation of the liquor traffic until two years after a petition against the prohibition of the sale of liquor therein has been granted. A division of the territory of such residence district for municipal governmental purposes, has no effect upon said district as to the force and effect of the liquor laws therein.

So holding, leave to file a petition in error is refused.

Henry and Marvin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/browning-v-westropp-ohiocirct-1909.