Browning v. Tucker
9 R.I. 500
Opinion
These replications must both be overruled. A new promise made by the maker of a promissory note, after the statute of limitations has once commenced to run against it, does not revive the note as against the guarantor, nor does the *501 absence of the maker from the state bar the operation of the statute in favor of a guarantor who remains therein, and against whom there exists a separate cause of action.
Demurrer sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Browning v. Tucker, 9 R.I. 500 (R.I. 1870).
9 R.I. 500 (Browning v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.