Browning v. State

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 514, 1931 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 86
Court of Claims of Illinois·Decided May 14, 1931·Published

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

In the above entitled matters this court has made allowances therein for the reasons therein given in the opinion.

It has been directed to the attention of this court that the amounts, as heretofore allowed in these causes, have not been as muck as was proper and desired. That being true, the court has permitted the above entitled causes to be reopened and recommends additional amounts in these cases, in the following sums:

Allen Williams, No. 1038, $1,000.00.

Samuel G. Harris, No. 1071, $1,000.00.

No amount is allowed in the Maxine Browning case, No. 1023.

The new cases involving the same person and the same injury, which have recently been filed, are hereby dismissed, being numbered as follows: Maxine Browning, No. 1023; Allen Williams, No. 1713; and Samuel G. Harris, No. 1071.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Browning v. State, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 514, 1931 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 86 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1931).

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 514 (Browning v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.