Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Browning v. State

Browning v. State

902 So. 2d 897, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8111, 2005 WL 1277841
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Browning v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 932 So. 2d 1150 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 1, 2005·No. No. 1D04-4322·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is granted. The trial court is directed to rule on petitioner’s pending motion to correct illegal sentence. We withhold issuance of the writ, being confident that the trial court will rule forthwith on the pending [898]*898motion and will take such further action as is required in a timely manner.

ERVIN, PADOVANO and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Browning v. State, 902 So. 2d 897, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8111, 2005 WL 1277841 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

902 So. 2d 897 (Browning v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.