Browning v. Fox
186 A.D. 885
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Browning v. Fox. Read the opinion of the Court — 183 A.D. 778 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1918·Published
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to renew. An application to modify the decision of the court so as to provide for a new trial was not embraced in the notice of motion. Due notice of the application and of the grounds upon which it [886]*886is based should be given to the plaintiff, pursuant to rule VIII.
App. Div. Rules, First Dept., rule 8.— [Rep-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Browning v. Fox, 186 A.D. 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).
186 A.D. 885 (Browning v. Fox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.