Browning v. Commissioner

9 T.C.M. 1061, 1950 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 33
United States Tax Court·Decided November 27, 1950·No. Docket Nos. 20186, 20190, 20191, 20192, 21127, 21128, 21129, 21130.·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mary Alice Browning v. Commissioner. Knox A. Browning v. Commissioner. Estate of M. M. Dawson, Deceased, Ruth B. Dawson and Richard M. Dawson, Executors v. Commissioner. Ruth Dawson v. Commissioner.
Browning v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 20186, 20190, 20191, 20192, 21127, 21128, 21129, 21130.
United States Tax Court
1950 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 33; 9 T.C.M. (CCH) 1061; T.C.M. (RIA) 50285;
November 27, 1950
J. M. McMillan, Esq., 2614 Gladstone Dr., Dallas, Tex., for the petitioners. D. Louis Bergeron, Esq., for the respondent.

JOHNSON

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

JOHNSON, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in income tax for the years 1944 and 1945 in the following amounts:

DocketDefi-
No.PetitionerYearciency
20186Mary Alice Browning1944$1,093.88
2112819451,109.26
20190Knox A. Browning19441,093.88
2112719451,075.68
20191Estate of M. M. Dawson19441,155.24
211291945931.08
20192Ruth Dawson19441,155.24
211301945931.08

*34 The proceedings were consolidated for hearing.

The first and principal issue is whether the gains realized by F. C. Crane Company, a partnership, in the fiscal years ended January 31, 1944, and January 31, 1945, from the sale of certain equipment were capital gains under section 117(j), Internal Revenue Code, or ordinary income. The second issue, arising only in the event it is held that such gains were capital gains, is whether interest and "rentals" received in the year of sale on such of the above equipment as was sold under "rental agreements with recapture provisions" are properly includible in the sales price of such equipment in computing the capital gains. The third issue, also arising only in the event it is held that such gains were capital gains, is whether "rentals" received in the year of sale on such of the above equipment as was sold under "rental agreements with options to purchase" are properly includible in the sales price of such equipment in computing the capital gains.

Findings of Fact

Knox A. Browning and Mary Alice Browning, husband and wife, were residents of Dallas, Texas, and filed their returns for the years herein involved*35 with the collector of internal revenue for the second collection district of Texas.

M. M. Dawson and Ruth Dawson, husband and wife, were also, until his demise in 1947, residents of Dallas, Texas, and filed their returns for the years herein involved with the collector of internal revenue for the second collection district of Texas.

M. M. Dawson and Knox A. Browning were equal partners in F. C. Crane Company, (hereinafter referred to as the partnership), which was organized on or about April 1, 1937, to succeed to a corporation of the same name organized in 1926, and which continued through the years 1944 and 1945, the years involved in these proceedings. The income tax returns of the partnership were filed with the collector of internal revenue for the second collection district of Texas for the fiscal years ended January 31, 1944, and January 31, 1945. Its principal place of business was located in Dallas. Since its inception the partnership has both sold and rented heavy machinery and equipment consisting of bulldozers, cranes, graders, pneumatic tools, and other equipment used by contractors. The partnership income tax returns for the below fiscal years, as broken down by respondent's*36 agent in Dallas, disclosed the following:

FiscalGrossRental
Year EndedSalesIncome
3/31/41$199,952.53$196,891.36
1/ 1/42317,129.80230,614.64
1/ 1/43320,883.45319,772.25
1/ 1/44210,503.09108,765.18
1/ 1/45

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Browning v. Commissioner, 9 T.C.M. 1061, 1950 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 33 (tax 1950).

9 T.C.M. 1061 (Browning v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mafco Equip. Co. v. Comm'r
1983 T.C. Memo. 637 (U.S. Tax Court, 1983)
SEC CORPORATION v. United States
140 F. Supp. 717 (S.D. New York, 1956)