Browning v. City of St. Louis

163 S.W.3d 493, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 665, 2005 WL 1018182
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 3, 2005·No. ED 84191·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment upholding the Excise Commissioner’s approval of a retail liquor license. The decision of the Excise Commissioner is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Browning v. City of St. Louis, 163 S.W.3d 493, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 665, 2005 WL 1018182 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

163 S.W.3d 493 (Browning v. City of St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Woods
163 S.W.3d 493 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)