Browning v. Browning

221 A.D. 801
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1927·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order awarding additional counsel fee and expenses affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We are of opinion that the reservation of power to make such other and further provisions regarding additional counsel fee and reimbursement for expenses and disbursements incurred or made on behalf of defendant, to be determined at the close of the trial of the action, was acquiesced in by plaintiff in allowing the order to remain without resettlement or appeal, and that the consent of the husband referred to in Lonsdale v. Lonsdale (41 App. Div. 224, 226) was thus given. Kelly, P. J., Young, Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur; Lazansky, J., concurs in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Browning v. Browning, 221 A.D. 801 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

221 A.D. 801 (Browning v. Browning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rosen v. Rosen
18 Misc. 2d 257 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)