Brownell v. Slocum

New York Supreme Court

Brownell v. Slocum

3 Johns. 430

DecidedAugust 15, 1808

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Johns. 430 (Brownell v. Slocum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brownell v. Slocum, 3 Johns. 430 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By the 16th section of the act of the last session, (Sess. 31. ch. 204.) it is provided, that no omission or misrecital of any oaths prescribed by the act, in the return of any justice to a certiorari, shall be assigned for error, unless it be alleged in the affidavit, on which such certiorari issued, that exception was made to the form of the oath administered at the trial. The judgment below must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

By the 16th section of the act of the last session, (Sess. 31. ch. 204.) it is provided, that no omission or misrecital of any oaths prescribed by the act, in the return of any justice to a certiorari, shall be assigned for error, unless it be alleged in the affidavit, on which such certiorari issued, that exception was made to the form of the oath administered at the trial. The judgment below must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Johns. 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brownell-v-slocum-nysupct-1808.