Brownell v. Schindel
227 N.W. 955, 119 Neb. 848, 1929 Neb. LEXIS 45
Opinion
This is an action brought by plaintiff as receiver of the Security State Bank of Omaha to recover on the alleged double liability of defendant as a stockholder in the insolvent bank. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of plaintiff. Defendant has appealed.
We have carefully considered the record and find the same to be without prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is therefore
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brownell v. Schindel, 227 N.W. 955, 119 Neb. 848, 1929 Neb. LEXIS 45 (Neb. 1929).
227 N.W. 955 (Brownell v. Schindel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.