Browne v. S. Hernsheim Bros. & Co.
This text of 71 Miss. 574 (Browne v. S. Hernsheim Bros. & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The demurrer of appellant to the bill filed against himself and others should have been sustained. The proceeding was an ordinary suit by a simple creditor’s bill, and was prematurely filed. There is no single averment in it that any one of the debts sought to be enforced against the estate of J. E. Browne was due; and until the debt was due, there was no right of action. There being, at the time of the filing of the bill, no present right of action against the debtor, J. E. Browne, the suit was non-maintainable against any of his co-defendants. See Wiggle v. Thomason, 11 Smed. & M., 452; Winston v. Miller, 12 Ib., 550; Brown v. Bank, 31 Miss., 454; Salmon v. Smith, 58 Ib., 399; Bank v. Buddig, 65 Ib., 284.
Reversed' and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 Miss. 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/browne-v-s-hernsheim-bros-co-miss-1893.