Browne v. S. Hernsheim Bros. & Co.

71 Miss. 574
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1893·Published

Opinion

Woods, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The demurrer of appellant to the bill filed against himself and others should have been sustained. The proceeding was an ordinary suit by a simple creditor’s bill, and was prematurely filed. There is no single averment in it that any one of the debts sought to be enforced against the estate of J. E. Browne was due; and until the debt was due, there was no right of action. There being, at the time of the filing of the bill, no present right of action against the debtor, J. E. Browne, the suit was non-maintainable against any of his co-defendants. See Wiggle v. Thomason, 11 Smed. & M., 452; Winston v. Miller, 12 Ib., 550; Brown v. Bank, 31 Miss., 454; Salmon v. Smith, 58 Ib., 399; Bank v. Buddig, 65 Ib., 284.

Reversed' and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Browne v. S. Hernsheim Bros. & Co., 71 Miss. 574 (Mich. 1893).

71 Miss. 574 (Browne v. S. Hernsheim Bros. & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown, Bros. v. Bank of Mississippi
31 Miss. 454 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1856)