Browne v. Hibbets

263 A.D. 827, 31 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5167

This text of 263 A.D. 827 (Browne v. Hibbets) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Browne v. Hibbets, 263 A.D. 827, 31 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5167 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Action by a member of a trade union to compel his reinstatement, to set aside and annul a determination of the executive board fining him, requiring his employer to rehire him and for damages against the local union for alleged unlawful expulsion. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment in so far as it denied him damages, denied an annulment of the determination of the executive board of the local union, and denied his re-employment. Cross-appeal by defendant Hibbets from so much of the judgment as reinstated the plaintiff to his status as it existed after the determination of the executive board finding the plaintiff guilty of the offense changed, and fining him, and permitting plaintiff to prosecute his appeal before the joint council in the event that he paid the fine imposed within thirty days after the entry of judgment. Judgment, in so far as it granted plaintiff relief, reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, without costs. In view of the foregoing, plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed, without costs. The record establishes that the plaintiff did not exhaust his remedies within the local union and the parent body; therefore, he was not entitled to have recourse to the courts for relief, in view of the finding of the court that the defendant Hibbets had acted in good faith. (Havens v. King, 221 App. Div. 475; affd., 250 N. Y. 617; Lafond v. Deems, 81 id. 507.) Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Havens v. Dodge
166 N.E. 346 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
Havens v. King
221 A.D. 475 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 A.D. 827, 31 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/browne-v-hibbets-nyappdiv-1941.