Home/California Supreme Court/Browne v. Ferrea

Browne v. Ferrea

51 Cal. 552
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1876
Docket5024
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 51 Cal. 552 (Browne v. Ferrea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Browne v. Ferrea, 51 Cal. 552 (Cal. 1876).

Opinions

By the Court:

Three separate tracts of land were levied on by the sheriff under the execution against the defendant, were advertised as separate tracts, but were sold in a mass as one entire tract. This was an irregularity, to correct which the defendant had his remedy by motion to set aside the sale on notice to the judgment creditor, sheriff, and purchaser at the sale. (Code Civil Procedure, 694.)

To uphold the sale would' be to deprive the judgment debtor of his right to redeem any one of the separate parcels.

Order reversed and cause remanded, with direction to grant the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamilton v. Carpenter
126 P.2d 395 (California Court of Appeal, 1942)
Mitchell v. Alpha Hardware & Supply Co.
45 P.2d 442 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
State Ex Rel. Coffey v. District Court
240 P. 667 (Montana Supreme Court, 1925)
Colver v. W. B. Scarborough Co.
238 P. 1104 (California Court of Appeal, 1925)
Fienup v. Kleinman
172 N.W. 804 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1919)
Craig v. Stansbury
174 P. 404 (California Court of Appeal, 1918)
Marston v. White
27 P. 588 (California Supreme Court, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 Cal. 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/browne-v-ferrea-cal-1876.