Brown v. Yaspan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brown v. Yaspan

256 A.D. 840, 9 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5100

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 30, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 840 (Brown v. Yaspan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Yaspan, 256 A.D. 840, 9 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5100 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Action for damages for personal injuries and loss of employment due to the alleged wrongful acts of the defendants. Order in so far as it grants respondent’s motion to strike out certain allegations in the complaint reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The allegations struck out improperly deprive the plaintiff of the right to prove certain alleged acts and methods employed by the defendants to ruin the plaintiff. Their excision devitalized the complaint. Their retention may not be said to prejudice the defendants by requiring them to plead thereto. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 991,]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for damages for personal injuries and loss of employment due to the alleged wrongful acts of the defendants. Order in so far as it grants respondent’s motion to strike out certain allegations in the complaint reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The allegations struck out improperly deprive the plaintiff of the right to prove certain alleged acts and methods employed by the defendants to ruin the plaintiff. Their excision devitalized the complaint. Their retention may not be said to prejudice the defendants by requiring them to plead thereto. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 991,]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 840, 9 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-yaspan-nyappdiv-1939.