Brown v. Workforce Safety & Insurance

North Dakota Supreme Court

Brown v. Workforce Safety & Insurance

2017 ND 151, 897 N.W.2d 339, 2017 WL 2817431, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 158

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedJune 29, 2017

Docket20170083

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 ND 151 (Brown v. Workforce Safety & Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Workforce Safety & Insurance, 2017 ND 151, 897 N.W.2d 339, 2017 WL 2817431, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 158 (N.D. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Brian Brown appeals from a judgment affirming a decision of Workforce Safety and Insurance (‘WSI”) to terminate his disability and vocational rehabilitation benefits and require that he repay WSI $2,558.57 in benefits. We conclude the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) made no reversible error of law in interpreting the terms of the contractual rehabilitation stipulation between Brown and WSI, and the ALJ’s finding that Brown was in noncompliance with the stipulation is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We summarily affirm the judgment under N.D.RApp.P. 35.1(a)(5).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers *340 Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Brian Brown appeals from a judgment affirming a decision of Workforce Safety and Insurance (‘WSI”) to terminate his disability and vocational rehabilitation benefits and require that he repay WSI $2,558.57 in benefits. We conclude the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) made no reversible error of law in interpreting the terms of the contractual rehabilitation stipulation between Brown and WSI, and the ALJ’s finding that Brown was in noncompliance with the stipulation is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We summarily affirm the judgment under N.D.RApp.P. 35.1(a)(5).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers *340 Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 ND 151, 897 N.W.2d 339, 2017 WL 2817431, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-workforce-safety-insurance-nd-2017.