Brown v. Wilson

209 F.2d 151, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3142
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 21, 1953·No. 11857·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been considered by the Court on the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties;

And the Court being of the opinion that the appellant in walking upon the right shoulder of the highway at about 11:00 p. m., when he was struck and injured by appellee’s automobile which was traveling in the same direction as was appellant, was violating the provisions of Kentucky Revised Statutes 189.570 *152 and by reason thereof was contributo-rily negligent as a matter of law;

And that it was not error on the part of the District Judge to sustain appel-lee’s motion for summary judgment by reason thereof; Saddler v. Parham, Ky., 249 S.W.2d 945; Applegate v. Johnson, 306 Ky. 358, 208 S.W.2d 77; See also Hughes v. Bates’ Adm’r, 278 Ky. 592, 129 S.W.2d 138;

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Wilson, 209 F.2d 151, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3142 (6th Cir. 1953).

209 F.2d 151 (Brown v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allman v. Beam
130 So. 2d 194 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1961)