Brown v. Wilson

Sixth Circuit

Brown v. Wilson

209 F.2d 151, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3142

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 21, 1953

Docket11857

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 209 F.2d 151 (Brown v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Wilson, 209 F.2d 151, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3142 (6th Cir. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been considered by the Court on the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties;

And the Court being of the opinion that the appellant in walking upon the right shoulder of the highway at about 11:00 p. m., when he was struck and injured by appellee’s automobile which was traveling in the same direction as was appellant, was violating the provisions of Kentucky Revised Statutes 189.570 *152 and by reason thereof was contributo-rily negligent as a matter of law;

And that it was not error on the part of the District Judge to sustain appel-lee’s motion for summary judgment by reason thereof; Saddler v. Parham, Ky., 249 S.W.2d 945; Applegate v. Johnson, 306 Ky. 358, 208 S.W.2d 77; See also Hughes v. Bates’ Adm’r, 278 Ky. 592, 129 S.W.2d 138;

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI