Brown v. . Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Brown v. . Williams

83 N.C. 684

DecidedJune 5, 1880

StatusPublished

This text of 83 N.C. 684 (Brown v. . Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. . Williams, 83 N.C. 684 (N.C. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, C. J.

The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal must be allowed. The record shows that the appeal was entered by consent on July 2, 1869, the undertaking on appeal executed August 29 following, and the transcript filed in this court June 14, 1880, during the present term.

Neither was the undertaking given in time, nor the appeal prosecuted as required by the rules of this court, as determined in Sever v. McLaughlin, 82 N. C., 342, and Smith v. Lyon, Ibid., 2.

Per Curiam. Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, C. J.

The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal must be allowed. The record shows that the appeal was entered by consent on July 2, 1869, the undertaking on appeal executed August 29 following, and the transcript filed in this court June 14, 1880, during the present term.

Neither was the undertaking given in time, nor the appeal prosecuted as required by the rules of this court, as determined in Sever v. McLaughlin, 82 N. C., 342, and Smith v. Lyon, Ibid., 2.

Per Curiam. Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 N.C. 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-williams-nc-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack