Brown v. White
This text of 3 Blackf. 431 (Brown v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action of covenant by White against Brozan on this agreement, in which the plaintiff averred performance of his part and recovered, the following points were decided:—
[432]*4322. For a breach of any of Brown’s covenants in the agreement, a suit might be sustained against him by White, without an averment in the declaration that a performance had been previously requested.
■ 3. Promissory notes executed by Brown alone, were not the security for the payment of the 600 dollars, which wás required by the agreement,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Blackf. 431, 1834 Ind. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-white-ind-1834.