Brown v. White

Indiana Supreme Court

Brown v. White

3 Blackf. 431, 1834 Ind. LEXIS 46

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 28, 1834·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action of covenant by White against Brozan on this agreement, in which the plaintiff averred performance of his part and recovered, the following points were decided:—

[432]*4322. For a breach of any of Brown’s covenants in the agreement, a suit might be sustained against him by White, without an averment in the declaration that a performance had been previously requested.

■ 3. Promissory notes executed by Brown alone, were not the security for the payment of the 600 dollars, which wás required by the agreement,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action of covenant by White against Brozan on this agreement, in which the plaintiff averred performance of his part and recovered, the following points were decided:—

[432]*4322. For a breach of any of Brown’s covenants in the agreement, a suit might be sustained against him by White, without an averment in the declaration that a performance had been previously requested.

■ 3. Promissory notes executed by Brown alone, were not the security for the payment of the 600 dollars, which wás required by the agreement,

Brown v. White, 3 Blackf. 431, 1834 Ind. LEXIS 46 (Ind. 1834).

Pincite

3 Blackf. 431 (Brown v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related