Brown v. Wells

Supreme Court of Georgia

Brown v. Wells

159 S.E. 286, 172 Ga. 904, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 238

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 12, 1931·No. No. 8324·Published

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The suit was brought to recover forty acres of land and the timber growing thereon. On the trial it appeared that the real contention was over 18-3/4 acres out of the 40 described in the petition. The verdict was for the plaintiff, and the defendant excepted to the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial. , The only special grounds of the motion were expressly abandoned by the plaintiff in error. Weld, that the verdict is supported by evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

The suit was brought to recover forty acres of land and the timber growing thereon. On the trial it appeared that the real contention was over 18-3/4 acres out of the 40 described in the petition. The verdict was for the plaintiff, and the defendant excepted to the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial. , The only special grounds of the motion were expressly abandoned by the plaintiff in error. Weld, that the verdict is supported by evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Brown v. Wells, 159 S.E. 286, 172 Ga. 904, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 238 (Ga. 1931).

Pincite

159 S.E. 286 (Brown v. Wells) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.